Thursday, November 12, 2009

The Entitlement Mentality-Just Give Me What I Need


Yesterday after work I quickly tuned into Sean Hannity’s radio show for a quick second before hopping on the subway. Being Thursday, he has a segment of his show called, “Man on the Street Thursday”. It’s akin to Jay Leno’s “Jay Walking” in which one of Hannity’s staff hands a cell phone over to some commuter and asks basic questions like, “Who is the vice president” Do you know who Nancy Pelosi or Harry Reed is?

On this occasion, I dropped into the middle of a heated argument between Hannity and an African American woman who insisted that Mayor Mike Bloomberg has too much money for one man and that it needs to be taken away from him [by the government] and passed along to other people less fortunate.

“How did Bloombeg make all that money?”

“He ran a successful business,” Hannity said, “He broke no law, and pays his taxes.”

“And who allowed him to make all that money, Sean?” she asked, “The government right, lets be real.”

I couldn’t believe the stuff she was saying. But, then I thought of this video of another Black woman:





Then Sean asked his setup question:

“Then you believe in taking from each according to their ability, to each according to their need, right”

“That’s right. He has too much money for one man.”

“You know who said that?” Hannity asked.

“No, who?

“Karl Marx!”

Now I’m not trying to write another hidden Communists/Barack Obama admirer post. But, that woman is representative to a mentality that I cannot identify with. However, a lot of Leftist thinks that spreading somebody else’s wealth via the claws of government is the way it ought to be.

It made no difference to this woman that Michael Bloomberg is an American success story who took himself from humble beginnings and work his way into becoming a billionaire. The entitlement mentality believers that the less fortunate deserved to be taken cared of.

But, how did they become less fortunate exactly? Oh, I’m not allowed to ask that, right?

The rich, according to the entitlement mentality, are all evil anyway, so why not take it away from them?

These aren’t stupid people. They just have a different worldview that I thank God I do not share. In my opinion, there are two types of people in this country:

1. Those that are about something
2. Those that are not about something

The first group is self-reliant. They make things happen for themselves. These people are the ones who stay in school, or develop marketable skill that helps them put food on the table. These people don’t stay at a minimum wage job without benefits, but rather use it as a stepping stone until something better comes along. This group doesn’t allow outsider forces to keep them from achieving their individual goals. They don’t care who’s sitting in the White House. They overcome barriers because they have a responsibility to themselves or others, because it just has to get done. Some people in this group achieve great success relatively quickly, others may take a lot longer, but their progress is steady.

Now let me talk about the second group in a blunt way. These people are not self-reliant. These are the first people who drop out of school, or never develop a marketable skill that puts food on the table. They always have excuses as to why they're not progressing in their life (racism, unfairness, the teacher doesn’t like me, I’m keeping it real, to name a few…). These are the type of people who do the same things at ages 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 and beyond, and would tell you with a straight face at age 48, “I’m just trying to get myself together.” These people have baby mommas or baby daddies spread over different states so child support payments (if they’re even paying it) keeps them in perpetual poverty.

You never hear in Leftist circles, a discussion about the choices people make.

Life is the sum total of all our choices.

It always starts from the standpoint of 5 or 8 choices after the fact, like 70% of African American babies are born out of wedlock.

Self-inflicted wounds are not up for discussion.

Unless we fix our broken families, no amount of money spent by government will ever cure what really ails us. But, the entitlement mentality will always want to be fed by the sweat and toil of others. And it will always be the 1st group people that pays the price.

From The Last Tradition

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

A Salute to Our Veterans


God bless all those who have served or died for the cause of freedom. There are still some of us who appreciate all your service and sacrifice to defend our nation.

THANK YOU!

Sunday, November 8, 2009

J Randy Forbes For President in 2012


With so much going on in the country right now, the debate on Health Care, an act of domestic Terrorism at Fort Hood, Texas, and 10.2% unemployment rate thanks to President Obama’s incompetent economic policies, I feel the need to write about something utterly different in the blogesphere.

J. Randy Forbes came to my attention in the spring when he made an impassioned speech on the House floor in response to President Barack Obama’s assertion that the United States is no longer a Christian nation. I’ve been watching him ever since and I can’t help being impressed with this man.

He’s not only a man of faith, he’s a patriot that oozes Ronald Reagan every time I watch a video of him. In my opinion, J Randy Forbes is everything that Barack Obama is not. Or more plainly, he’s the Anti-Obama that offers a clear choice of Conservatism over Big Government Liberalism.

Nobody heard of Barack Obama prior to 2004 and now he is president. Congressman Forbes may not have the name recognition of a Sarah Palin or Mitt Romney. And I don’t even know if he even seeks the presidency. But, I see great potential in him.

From J Randy Forbes YouTude Page

Randy Forbes represents the diverse and expansive Fourth Congressional District of Virginia. Sworn in after a special election in 2001, he is now serving his fifth term in the U.S. House of Representatives. Randy focuses his efforts in Congress on protecting the security and sovereignty of our nation, preserving the moral and historical roots of our country, strengthening our military and supporting veterans, growing educational opportunities for our children, and promoting economic development through fiscal responsibility.

He serves as a Member of the House Judiciary committee and the House Armed Services Committee, where he is the Ranking Member of the Readiness Subcommittee.

Randy is the founder of the Congressional Prayer Caucus whose purpose is to recognize the vital role that prayer by individuals of all faiths has played in Congress and in America. He is also the founder of the Congressional Modeling and Simulation Caucus, the Congressional China Caucus, and co-chair of the Navy and Marine Corps Caucus.

Randy was born and raised in Chesapeake, Virginia where he still resides with his wife Shirley. He and Shirley have been married since 1978 and have four children: Neil, Jamie, Jordan, and Justin.



From The Last Tradition

Saturday, November 7, 2009

A Warning from Ronald Reagan about Socialized Medicine


As the debate rages on in the House of Representatives over Barack Obama’s ill-conceived, deficit-busting, freedom removing, tax increasing and centralized government planned abomination of a Health Care bill, Ronald Reagan warned America about the perils of socialized medicine.

Today, the face of government oppression (Barack Obama) is different, some say historical. But, President Obama is an old package clothed in new bubble wrap. And even if he signs a new Health Care bill into law, I see it as a moment for optimism, because I see it as a death knell of his presidency.

Deuteronomy 23:5

However, the LORD your God would not listen to Balaam but turned the curse into a blessing for you, because the LORD your God loves you.

Fear not, the forces of freedom are on the march!



From The Last Tradition

Conservatism On the Rise Ronald Reagan Crushes Barack Obama




From The Last Tradition

The forces of freedom will defeat collectivism!



Pass this video to everyone you know!

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Maybe Newt Had a Point…But When in Doubt Follow Reagan



In the wake of Tuesday’s election results, I’m very happy with the outcome of Virginia and New Jersey. Honestly, I didn’t think Christie was going to pull it out in the Garden state, but I couldn’t be happier John Corsine was given the boot.

However, I really wanted Doug Hoffman to win the 23rd CD seat in Upper New York. That tri-fecta would not only have sent a megaton message to Washington, but Conservative would have staked a greater foothold in the GOP.

In the heat of battle, I said some harsh things about Newt Gingrich for endorsing De De Scozzafava, a Liberal Republican, over Conservative Doug Hoffman. In farness to Newt, he got a lot of grief but he wasn’t alone in his endorsement. House Minority Leader, John Boehner, Minority Whip Eric Cantor, and Sen Pete Sessions and others also backed Scozzfava, but to my knowledge, they didn’t receive the same wrath from other Conservatives that Newt did.

In an interview with Sean Hannity today, Gingrich explained that he was informed by 11 Republican Chairman that they had selected Scozzafava as the Republican candidate in the special election. I think Newt deferred to the judgment of the local party bosses and really didn’t know anything or knew Scozzafava from a can of paint. He also noted that the GOP bosses failed to consult Mike Long of the Conservative Party prior to selecting Scozzafava.

Well, it all became a big mess and Newt Gingrich got caught in the neat grinder.

Moving forward, I hope the GOP will learn its lesson of what happened in NY 23. Select candidates wisely and don’t blur the lines of Conservatism for political expediency. Follow what Ronald Reagan said:


Ronald Reagan - Let Them Go Their Way

Let Them Go Their Way
March 1, 1975
2nd Annual CPAC Convention

“I don 't know about you, but I am impatient with those Republicans who after the last election rushed into print saying, "We must broaden the base of our party" -- when what they meant was to fuzz up and blur even more the differences between ourselves and our opponents.”


“Our people look for a cause to believe in. Is it a third party we need, or is it a new and revitalized second party, raising a banner of no pale pastels, but bold colors which make it unmistakably clear where we stand on all of the issues troubling the people?”


“A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers.


“I do not believe I have proposed anything that is contrary to what has been considered Republican principle. It is at the same time the very basis of conservatism. It is time to reassert that principle and raise it to full view. And if there are those who cannot subscribe to these principles, then let them go their way.”

From The Last Tradition