Jesus Loves Homosexuals, but hates homosexual behavior Gay Marraige

In the current secular, ignoring God climate, I’m sure I will be accused of being homophobic.

To that I say, “Whatever!”

It’s a typical tactic of the Left to divert attention away from real debate. It’s politically incorrect to say homosexuality is an immoral lifestyle.

But, it is!

So instead of having a real discussion with our beliefs intact, the Left insists on controlling mot only the language, but also people’s thoughts.

You’re not allowed to believe what the Bible says, but The Advocate should be treated as Gospel.

Speak not this word or think that thought because it’s offensive to a Black, or Homosexual. Oh, wait a minute, you can’t call a homosexual a homosexual, they’re Gay!

Yeah that’s a better word that used to mean “happy” but now it means a guy that likes taking it up the ass. But, gay is a better word, a happy word, a word that leaves someone with a good feeling, a good non-threatening word that can’t possibly mean immorality, a word that can’t possibly mean anything contrary to what God wanted, in fact who needs God anymore, he doesn’t exist anyway, right?.

Our laws are based on our Judea Christian beliefs! This may be an inconvenient truth for the Gay community.

Cry separation of church and state all you at your next pride parade. Even if Gay marriage becomes the law of the land in America, homosexuality will continue to be what it always has been, immoral.

Memeorandum Memeorandum Memeorandum

Don't Leave Without Clicking Other Great Stories in The Last Tradition. Tell two friends about this blog

Response to Ted Olson’s Claim that Same Sex Marriage is a Conservative Value

I don’t know what happened to Ted Olsen and the things he used to believe in?

James Brown would be very proud of the dance moves Ted Olson put on at Fox News Sunday.



The flaw in Ted Olson’s circular argument is that he is clearly rationalizing a so-called “right to same sex marriage” that he tacitly admits really doesn’t appear in the Constitution by answering a question with a question when he said, “Where does the right to inter-racial marriage appear in the Constitution?”

My question to Ted Olsen would be this:

If the right to marriage is a matter of liberty, privacy, association and spirituality guaranteed to each individual under the Constitution.

What happens to the liberty, privacy, association and spirituality of pastors, ministers, rabbis, priests, and imams who refuse to preside over a same-sex marriage based on their constitutionally protected right to worship as they wish in their churches, synagogues and mosques?

Do these clergymen automatically become criminals in the eyes of the law and if that is the case how does that not do immeasurable harm to the communities they serve?

This is the error in the argument that says same-sex marriage does no harm to the community.

And it’s only because the gay community insists on pushing the issue further and further along. Gays are not satisfied with Civil Unions that would give them the same protections as opposite sex couples.

No, not good enough for them!

They want to re-define the definition of marriage so they can have state-sanctioned seal of approval for lifestyle.

You may not like hearing it, and we have boatloads of politicians and clergy who are too cowardly to say it, but it’s the truth.

A Black man or woman cannot decide one day not to be Black. It’s the way they were born. It wasn’t a choice.

Homosexuality, however, is a choice!

One of the biggest lies in this country is that homosexuality cannot be overcome. It happens everyday and the story never gets told because it doesn’t suit the template of the Left.

But, having said that if one chooses to be homosexual, by all means knock yourself out!

Be happy in your gayness!

But, I guess it’s better to play the victim card to the hilt despite the fact that gay couples are allowed to adopt children like anybody else, they can live anywhere they want to live, and they have a higher per capita income than opposite sex couples.

Boy, that really sounds like having to sit in the back of the bus and having to drink from a “Gay Only” water fountain.

Cross ref Memeorandum

Don't Leave Without Clicking Other Great Stories in The Last Tradition. Tell two friends about this blog

Across the Pond in England Homosexual Couples Could Be Allowed to “Marry” in Traditional Religious Ceremonies

With all due respect to my Queer brothers and sisters, stop making a mockery of religious faith.

The battles that are being waged in Great Britain will soon be coming to our shores.

Pastors of the Church of the Nazarene would rather be put in jail than to be forced to perform religious ceremonies for homosexual couples.

From The UK Telegraph:

Lynne Featherstone, the equalities minister, said the Coalition was considering allowing same-sex couples to include key religious elements in civil partnership ceremonies.

In a parliamentary answer, she disclosed that homosexual couples could be permitted to use “religious readings, music and symbols”.
This would make civil partnerships practically indistinguishable from traditional weddings as Parliament recently removed the bar on same-sex unions in churches and other places of worship through an amendment to Labour’s Equality Act.

The proposals will delight equality campaigners who believe civil partnership is a “second-class” status, but they prompted fierce opposition from mainstream Christian leaders who believe marriage can only take place between a man and a woman.

Church of England sources warned that the Government could not make such dramatic changes merely by issuing regulations or guidance, as the current Civil Partnership Act prohibits the use of religious services during the registrations.

A spokesman made it clear that senior  figures in the established faith would resist any moves effectively to legalise homosexual marriage.
The Rt Rev Michael Langrish, the Bishop of Exeter, added in a personal statement: “As some of us warned at the time, the amendment to the Equality Bill has opened an area of unhelpful doubt and confusion. The Church of England will not be allowing use of any of its buildings for civil partnership registrations.”

Lord Tebbit, a former Tory party chairman who spoke out against same-sex unions in churches in the Lords, said: “I wouldn’t want anything done to add to the pretence that a civil partnership is a marriage. That’s the key thing, and anything which changes the law would have to come back to the Lords.”

In 2005, same-sex couples in Britain were allowed for the first time to take part in ceremonies that made them “civil partners”.

This gave them similar legal rights to married spouses, but the law required the events to take place in register offices or approved venues such as hotels and stately homes.

The ceremony has had to be secular, with no hymns or Bible readings, in order to preserve the definition of religious marriage as the union of a man and a woman.

When the Equality Bill was being debated earlier this year, an amendment was added by Lord Alli that permitted civil partnership ceremonies to take place in places of worship if the relevant religious group permitted it.

Quakers, Unitarians and the Liberal Judaism movement will ask to be allowed to host the ceremonies but the Church of England will resist it, despite the wishes of some liberal clerics, as will the Roman Catholic Church in England and Wales.

Registrars provided by local councils would still have to conduct civil partnership ceremonies.
Full story

Via UK Telegraph

Click to Read The Last Tradition

Gay Lobby Using Children to Fight for Gay Marriage

A favorite tactic of Liberals, who call themselves Progressives to soft-peddle what they really are, is to play upon people’s emotions instead of their intellect.

For example, voting for Barack Obama to make him the first African American president would be an historic event that would rock the world. Calling it “historic” was enough of an emotional tug to sway millions of voters into ignoring everything else he brought to the table, oh like…eh , his lack of experience, his socialistic views, and his comfort with all things radically Left.

But, I digress.

Liberals always play the “emotion card” and its quite effective to motivate people who are to busy with their day to day lives to realize what’s really going on.

So, it turns out that Gay Marriage advocates turned to a favorite tactic, using a child to play the emotion card:

A Child’s Stigma



How touching isn’t it?

Now, who would want that little blonde head boy to continue to go to school and be ridiculed by other kids? I mean children can be very cruel, right? And the part where one of his mothers almost burst in tears is especially designed to make you feel like a monster if you don’t support Gay Marriage.

It’s quite effective and a classic “red haring” to say the least. Please check out one of the greatest insights on how Liberals use reed herrings by Euripides on his wonderful blog, Self Evident Truths.

When the matter of Gay Marriage is ever discussed, absent from the conversation is how faith plays a central role in people’s feelings on the matter. Homosexuality is not only prohibited in the Christian faith, but also in Judaism and Islam as well. All three faiths believe that marriage should be between a man and woman.

That means billions, with a “B”, of people of this planet share this fundamental conviction.

But, Leftists have successfully controlled the rhetorical battle thanks to ineffective articulators on the Conservative side in deference to political correctness.

So the Left continues the tactic of making emotional pleas and deftly divert the language to a discussion of Civil Rights for Gays and Second Class citizenship for homosexuals having to endure being civilly unionized instead of married.

The battle continues…

Try to pay attention to the deceit from The Left that never ends.

See Blue Jersey

See Fox News

See Philly.com

From The Last Tradition